Indications
- Major indication is pain from incongruous GHJ which is unresponsive to non surgical treatment
- Operation is less often performed for loss of motion as return of movement less predictable than pain relief with TSR
- Neer et al 1982 – four considerations at time of unconstrained TSR to limit complications
- 1. Osseous deficiency of glenoid or humeral head
- 2. Defective rotator cuff
- 3. Deficient deltoid muscle due to axillary n palsy
- 4. Chronic instability
- Indications for TSR
- RA
- Osteoarthritis
- Primary Osteoarthritis
- Post traumatic Osteoarthritis
- Cuff arthropathy
- AVN with secondary glenoid changes
- Indications for Hemiarthroplasty
- Fracture
- Four-part NOH fracture
- Head splitting fracture
- Elderly patients with NOH non-union (esp. anatomical NOH fracture with AVN)
- Dislocation
- Locked dislocation
- Recurrent dislocation with Hill-Sachs lesion > 50%
- Fracture
- Contraindications
- Acute or persistent infection
- Flail joint
- Deltoid or Rotator Cuff paralysis
- Charcot joint
- Severe loss of bone stock
- Non compliant patient
Design
- Unconstrained
- Good / Excellent > 90%
- ± Glenoid resurfacing
- Rely on intact rotator cuff & deltoid
- Humeral component designed to
- Stable proximal humeral fixation
- Preserve cuff attachment
- Glenoid component designed to
- Stable glenoid fixation
- Preserve subchondral bone
- Types
- Neer prosthesis & Rockwood’s Global (De Puy) prosthesis
- Bigliani-Flatow (Zimmer) & Randelli (Lima) are modern modular variants
- Semiconstrained
- Hooded glenoid component
- Constrained
- Ball in socket
- High loosening & failure rates
- Periarticular fracture
- Loose glenoid
- Salvage procedure only for
- Tumours
- Irreparable massive cuff tears
- Flail shoulders
- Arthrodesis probably better option
Fixation techniques
- Cement
- Cementless
- HA coated
- Most common is the cemented humeral & glenoid components
Humerus
- Low rate of loosening (0.5-1%)
- Cement should be “thumbed in” without need for cement plug
- Pressurised cement ↑ risk of humeral fracture
Glenoid
- 1/3-1/2 will see lucent lines around the glenoid component
- But true clinical loosening only 2% (Cofield 1993)
- Significance of lucent lines uncertain
- Lucent lines are often present immediately post-op & can represent poor cementing technique
- Lucent line > 2mm deemed significant
- Lucency about keel more significant than around flanges
- May be association with clinical glenoid loosening & instability or cuff tears
- use of metal-backed HA coated glenoid seems to have reduced lucency but problems with
- Poly may separate from backing
- Asymmetric wear on posterior glenoid can lead to metallic debris
- Tried to overcome problem of loosening by mismatch of glenoid & humeral head with head being smaller than glenoid
- attempt to reduce rim contact during humeroglenoid translation
- addition of modularity allows
- Ease of revision
- Tensioning of soft tissues – lateralise the stem & so improve fulcrum for cuff
- Fracture treatment
Preoperative Assessment
- Need to exclude
- Cervical spine disease
- ACJ disease
- Neuromuscular causes
Require
- Functioning/ Repairable Cuff
- Maintain stability
- Maintain centre of joint rotation
- Intact Deltoid
- No joint instability
Investigations
Xray
- AP, Lateral & Axillary views
- AP GHJ view with IR & ER
- Assess humeral head & wear
- Superior head migration
- Osteophyte formation
- ACJ
- Thickness & diameter of humeral canal
- Humeral shaft deformity
- Axillary view
- Assess amount & position of glenoid wear
- Posterior bone deficient in Osteoarthritis
- Medial bone deficient in RA
- Extent of medial migration
- Position of humeral head
- Lateral view
- Anterior or Posterior translation seen
- Position of tuberosities
CT Scan
- assess bone deficiency
- help to plan bone graft requirements
Surgical Technique
Preop
- Evaluation & planning as above
- antibiotics
Positioning
- Beach chair position
- Mayfield head rest
- Fasten head with tape to it
- Close to edge of table to allow hyperextension of arm when humeral component inserted
- Arm board to support it
- Sand bag (500mL) under scapula
- Arm draped free
Incision & Approach
- Deltopectoral approach
- From deltoid origin to insertion
- Start
- Deltoid origin clavicle above coracoid
- Over
- apex of axilla
- To
- Deltoid insertion
- Start
- Deltopectoral groove opened with retraction of Cephalic Vein taken medially / laterally
- Expose Clavipectoral fascia
- Don’t detach Deltoid
- Upper 50% of tendinous Pectoralis Major divided
- Can palpate the Musculocutaneous nerve under conjoint tendon
- Minimum 17mm below coracoid
- Average 31mm
- Divide along lateral border of conjoint tendon
- Slip finger below the Subscapularis to palpate the Axillary nerve
- Ligate the Anterior Circumflex Humeral vessels at inferior border of the Subscapularis
- Subscapularishttp://www.youtube.com/embed/AM1LYQdbcb4?rel=0
- osteotomy
- released
- Off the humerus with 2cm cuff
- Capsule released off the humerus
- Anteriorly 12 o’clock to 6 o’clock
- Anteroinferior capsule excised
- ER to deliver the humeral head
Osteotomy
- Put in 35° of ER to obtain correct retroversion
- Flex elbow
- Use forearm as protractor
- Less retroversion in
- Recurrent posterior dislocation
- Deficient posterior glenoid
- Neck Cut
- 135°
- Above the tuberosities at articular margin of head
Stem & Head
- Head size
- 15mm deep head normally
- 22mm deep head useful in cuff arthropathy
- Correct height
- Head must sit above greater tuberosity 3-5mm
- Correct size
- Articulated concentrically with glenoid & CA arch
- Small enough to close subscapularis
- Correct tension
- Descent 1/2 head
- AP displacement 1/4 head
- Shaft-neck angle normally 135°
- Cemented or Press fit
Glenoid
- Prepare Glenoid if required
- Humeral head retractor to displace proximal humerus posteriorly
- Burr vertical slot in glenoid for keel of prosthesis
- Flatten glenoid so that trial sits flat
- If severe glenoid bone deficiency consider
- Angled component
- Bone graft
- Cement glenoid in position
- Insert stem
Closure
- Reattach Subscapularis
- Ensure there is 30-40° external rotation
- Close wound with drain
- Shoulder immobiliser in neutral
Postoperative
- Passive flexion & external rotation
- Pendulum exercises
- Use arm for gentle ADLs
- Sling for 1-2/52
- Start active resisted exercises at 6/52
Results
- Pain relief
- good 90%
- Range of motion
- variable
- Osteoarthritis with intact cuff – 120° elevation
- Posterior fracture or huge cuff tear – 40° elevation
- Survival
- comparable to other joints
- 90% survival (ie 10% revision) at 10 years for Osteoarthritis (Cofield)
- Ie. good mid-term results
- Results after trauma are inferior
- 90% survival (ie 10% revision) at 10 years for Osteoarthritis (Cofield)
- comparable to other joints
Special Circumstances
- Primary Osteoarthritis
- Recognised on XR as large anteroinferior osteophyte
- Axillary view reveals asymmetric wear with posterior glenoid deficiency
- Loose bodies common & sought after at surgery
- Remember glenoid deficiency may need to be addressed
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Severe bony & soft tissue destruction the rule
- Severe superior & medial glenoid wear common
- Cuff tears 30%
- Osteoporosis
- AC joint disease
- Always cement the humeral component because of the osteoporosis
- May need to use only large humeral component if glenoid bone stock insufficient
- Post op rehabilitation altered due to other limb involvement
- Cuff Tear Arthropathy
- Arthritis of Recurrent Dislocations
- Recognised by osteophyte formation on humeral head & Hill-Sach’s lesion on axillary view
- May require Subscapularis lengthening to allow ER particularly if previous surgery for instability
- Old Trauma
- Malunion or nonunion of the tuberosities
- Associated nerve injuries
- Shortened subscapularis
- Humeral head collapse & malalignment
- Bone loss from neck of humerus
Complications
In order of frequency
- Loosening of component ~ 5-40%
- Glenohumeral instability ~ 5-10%
- Rotator cuff tear ~ 5%
- Periprosthetic fracture < 2%
- Infection
- Failure of implant (incl dissociation of modular prosthesis)
- Weakness/ dysfunction of deltoid
- Aseptic loosening
- Symptomatic loosening responsible for 1/3 of complications
- 1. Glenoid Component loosening
- Radiolucent line seen in 30-50% postop of which more than 90% seen on initial postoperative radiographs (Neer 1982)
- Others have reported high incidence of radiolucent lines (eg 84% at 12 years, Torchia & Cofield)
- Incidence of clinical loosening (shift in component or radiolucent line >1.5-2mm) lower & varies from 2%-45%
- New designs include press-fit uncemented implants, plasma-sprayed implants, & tissue-ingrowth implants
- Current methods to enhance fixation & durability of the glenoid include
- Preservation of the subchondral plate
- Spherical reaming to optimise osseous support
- New glenoid designs & biomaterials
- Use glenoid component with larger radius of curvature than corresponding humeral head
- 2. Humeral Component loosening
- Subsidence & complete radiolucent lines not uncommon
- Radiolucent lines more common in humeral components inserted without cement
- Clinical findings associated with loosening rare
- 1. Glenoid Component loosening