Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy – ‘Tennis Elbow’

Definition

  • The eponymously named ‘tennis elbow’ encapsulates the diagnosis of a lateral elbow tendinopathy or ‘Lateral Epicondylitis. This typically involves disruption of the tendon matrix of ECRB or ECRL, near the common extensor origin

Epidemiology

  • The most common diagnosis for patients presenting with elbow pain, Affecting 1-3% of adults annually.
  • Given its relationship to load, it typically occurs in the dominant hand.
  • Peak incidence age 40 to 60
  • Associated with high repetition sports requiring excessive gripping
  • Associated with occupations requiring excess wrist extension

Anatomy and Physiology

  • Lateral elbow tendinopathy is cause by a tendinopathy of the extensor muscles which attach at the CEO (lateral epicondyle)
  • The Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis (ECRB) tendon is the most commonly affected tendon in elbow tendinopathy, followed by the Extensor Carpi Radialis Longus (ECRB).
  • Tendinopathy is a relatively newly coined term that captures the lifecycle of a tendon as it responds to stress. There are typically thought to be 3 stages.

  • Reactive tendinopathy
    • A tendon responding to a sudden change in load, or an acute stressor (trauma). Localised inflammation, structurally remains intact and indectectable, with limited change to the tendon matrix or collagen integrity
    • This is an entirely reversible and physiological process
  • Dysrepair tendinopathy
    • Following stage 1, if there remains to be excessive loading there will begin to be dysregulation of the collagen and tendon matrix, hypervascularity and neural ingrowth..
  • Degenerative tendinopathy
    • Chronic overloading condition, disorganised collagen, increased tendon matrix breakdown, further increased vasculairty and neural ingrowth. Thick and structurally weak tendons with a greater chance of tendon rupture.

Clinical Features

  • The diagnosis of ‘tennis elbow’ is largely a clinical diagnosis, that requires very minimal investigation other than a comprehensive clinical examination. Further imaging is only necessary if there is doubt re diagnosis or if the injury is not responding well to exercise based therapy
  • History
    • Onset
      • There are 2 clinical presentations of lateral elbow tendinopathy.
      • The most common has an insidious onset 24-72 hours post activity unaccustomed to the patient involving repeated wrist extension (e.g laying bricks over weekend, using screw driver etc)
      • Sudden onset elbow pain, in situation of single instance of exertion involving the wrist. The insidious onset is thought to correspond to larger macroscopic tendon tears.
    • Activity type
      • Activities of repetitive motion, requiring gripping or elbow extension e.g tennis, squash or occupation such as brick laying, sewing
    • Change of activity:
      • New physical activity or change in load to pre-existing exercise
      • E.g hitting heavy tennis balls, poor technique in hitting ‘late’ requiring more forearm strength to compensate, change of raquet.
    • Location of pain
      • Typically 5cm distal to the lateral epicondyle
    • Associated features
      • Paraesthesia (typically radial nerve distribution), subjective feeling of weakness
  • Examination
  • Look
    • Joint deformity
    • Inflammation
    • Redness
  • Feel
    • Palpation at CEO (Lateral epicondyle)
    • Insertional (at lateral epicondyle)
    • Mid-substance lesion (typical 1-2cm distal of lateral epicondyle)
    • Tissue tightness or hypersensitivity
  • Move
    • Reproducible pain namely on wrist extension when wrist is extended and forearm pronated.
    • Particularly on Wrist extension (ECRB)
      • Pronated and extended position is of the best sensitivity as ERCB also acts synergistically to anchor the 3rd MCP to allow extension to take place at the digits.
    • Middle finger extension (ECRL)
  • Neurovascular provocation test
    • Radial nerve bias
  • Cervical spine
    • Typically decreased ROM lateral flexion at C-spine given radial nerve provocation testing.

Investigations

X-ray

  • AP/Lateral view of elbow
    • Would expect a normal XR, however, may show signs of calcification in the extensor musculature (minority of patients)
  • Xray can assist in ruling out other differential diagnosis

Ultrasound (Most diagnostic)

  • The cavet of all US requires experienced ultrasonographer
  • Increased thickness to extensor tendon, distortion of tendon architecture, hypo echoic appearance of tendon

MRI

  • Limited utility
  • Potential thickening, swelling and destruction of tissue architecture at extensor tendons.

Differential Diagnosis

  • Septic arthritis
  • Pseudogout
  • Acute bursitis
  • Cellulitis
  • RA
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Seronegative spondyloarthropathy

Management

  • No single treatment is totally effective, and like all orthopaedic injuries a multi-disciplinary approach is probably the most useful for patient.
  • Goals of treatment
    • Analgesia
      • RICER (Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation, Re-assess) in the early phase
      • Bracing or Taping
        • Bracing has been shown to increase forearm extensor stretch tolerance however does not improve strength or proprioception.
        • De-loading taping (diamond taping technique) has been shown to reduce pain through reducing tissue stress.
      • Isometric exercises
        • Isometric wrist hold
      • Medication (Paracetamol, NSAIDs, where appropriate)
      • Electrotherapy (2nd line)
      • Cortisone injection (2nd line) (usually if physiotherapy fails or pt unable to engage in exercised based strengthening due to pain)
        • Injected to the point of most severe pain or around ERCB attachment site.
        • Counsel pts that conservative therapy has a success rate of around 80% in 12 months.
      • Platelet-rich plasma (last line) (PRP)
  • Address grip strength deficit initially through exercise based management
    • Progressively graduated wrist strengthening exercises focusing on wrist extension primarily.
    • Pain is expected during exercises, recommend exerting to 4-6/10 pain threshold.
    • Manual based therapies can assist to assist in mobilisation, flexibility and engagement in further exercised based strenghting.
  • Co-ordination based exercises
  • Correction of pre-disposing factors
    • Technique, equipment, jobs
  • Return to function

Surgical techniques

  • (Consider in those failing to respond to conservative management, or ongoing pain)
    • Nirschl open release (with or without drilling)
      • Incision around lateral epicondyle to expose ECRL, ECRB and EDC. Resection of the angiofibroblastic tendinosis tissue within ERCB
      • Drilling – decorticating anterolateral humeral condyle, to increase blood supply. (Studies has recommend against, increased pain and nil increased patient benefit)
      • Reported 85% success rate
      • Median return to work 5 weeks
      • One study showed, nil difference between (open release v sham surgery
    • Percutaneous division of the common extensor origin
      • Incision directly over lateral epicondyle, extensor origins divided transversely, incision though synovial membrane, decortication of bone at lateral epicondyle.
      • Rest in sling 2 weeks, then early and active ROM exercises
  • Complications
    • Surgical wound infections
    • Haematoma
    • Damage to nerve
    • Need for revision surgery

REFERENCE

  • Rees JD, Maffulli N, Cook J. Management of tendinopathy. The American journal of sports medicine. 2009 Sep;37(9):1855-67.
  • Keijsers R, de Vos RJ, Kuijer PP, van den Bekerom MP, van der Woude HJ, Eygendaal D. Tennis elbow. Shoulder & elbow. 2019 Oct;11(5):384-92.
  • Brukner P, Khan K. Clinical sports medicine revised. Australia: McGraw-Hill. 2002;128:145-72.