Skip to content
Epidemiology
- Uncommon
- Crosses socio-economic and cultural boundaries
- Probably under diagnosed
- Important to recognise (but difficult)
- Small proportion of children presenting with fractures
- Commonly have occult fractures
History
- Important to recognise (but difficult)
- Risk Factors
- Twins,
- unplanned pregnancies,
- lower socio-economic status,
- children with special needs,
- pre-term babies
- Age – Younger more likely with key ages of less than 2 and 1
- Developmental age
- Mechanism
- History of previous injury
- Medical problems
- Rare causes predisposing to fractures
- Bone and mineral disease, Osteogenesis imperfecta
Examination
- General findings
- altered level of consciousness,
- difficulty in breathing,
- seizures,
- failure to thrive.
- Specific orthopaedic features
- Assessment of
- pain,
- swelling,
- deformity,
- range of movement
- altered function/ability to weight-bear
- Bruising
- Common in mobile children and in NAI
- Most common clinical finding
- Look for
- away from bony prominences,
- larger bruises,
- Specific shapes,
- multiple or clustered configurations
Fractures
- Fractures with high specificity
- Metaphyseal fractures
- Rib fractures
- Scapular fractures
- Outer-end clavicle fractures
- Fractures of different ages
- Vertebral fractures or subluxation
- Digital injuries in non-mobile children
- Bilateral fractures
- Complex skull fractures
- Frequent fractures but with low specificity
- Mid-clavicular fractures
- Simple linear skull fractures
- Single long-bone fractures
Long bones and NAI
- Femur fractures – under 1
- Tibia and fibula under 18 months
- Any Humeral fracture under 15 months
- Humeral spiral fractures commonly associated with NAI
- Diaphysis 4 X more common than metaphysis
- Epiphysis rare
- Metaphyseal fractures are uncommon in infants
- Think NAI
Metaphyseal fractures
- Uncommon under 2
- Indirect forces
- Acceleration – deceleration
- Associated in neonatal period
- Classic corner and bucket handle #’s
- Occur through the weak zone
Investigations
- XRays
- to confirm fracture
- To rule out NAI
- Blood Tests
- Consider biochemical tests, tests for osteogenesis imperfecta
- Skeletal survey
- Periodic review and monitoring of callus formation
- Experienced radiologist
- Bone scan
- Metaphyseal fractures
- Poor sensitivity – growth
- Diaphyseal fractures
- Dual modalities
- Including CT should be considered
Conclusions
- Literature is poor evaluating orthopaedic features of NAI
- Retrospective studies = BIAS to NAI
- Almost no quality comparative prospective epidemiological studies
- Highlighted with metaphyseal fractures
- High risk groups not studied appropriately
- Multidisciplinary group
Take home message
- Think about NAI
- Involve pediatricians if concerned (multidisciplinary approach)
- Non ambulant and children under 1 year with fractures
- Multiple fractures
- Fracture sights and patterns