Journal Club

March 2010

Reverse V osteotomy of the distal humerus the correction of cubitus varus

Yun YH, Shin SJ, Moon JG.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University, Mok-dong Hospital, 911-1, Mok-dong, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul 158-710, Korea.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Apr;89(4):527-31

Abstract link

Reviewed by

Dr Josh Petterwood

MBBS | Accredited Orthopaedic Registrar

Introduction

  • Case series/technical note

Methodology

  • Pre-operative planning
    • Full length XR both arms
      • Humeral-elbow-wrist angle both arms
      • Valgus +, varus –
      • Amount of correction required based on contralateral arm
    • Osteotomy planned
    • Correction of lateral/medial prominence
  • Procedure
    • Tourniquet, lateral, elbow 90° flexion
    • Posterolateral approach
    • Goniometer
    • ABC resected
    • Lateral rotation of distal segment
    • Lateral crossed K-wire and wiring

    • 90° slab for 2/52 then active ROM
  • Evaluation
    • Radiologically
      • Correction of deformity based on humeral-elbow-wrist angle
      • Lateral prominence (X-Y)
    • Clinically
      • ROM
      • Complications
    • Rated as excellent/good/poor according to Oppenheim

Results

  • 22 children with cubitus varus
    • 19 boys, 3 girls
    • Mean age 9.5
    • 17 supracondylar, 2 lateral condylar, 2 medial condylar, 1 physeal seperation
    • All children had good elbow function and full ROM
    • Indication was cosmetic deformity
  • 20 excellent, 2 good (at mean follow up 16/12)
  • All osteotomies united at 10 weeks
  • Mean pre-operative deformity
    • -16.9 (-25 to +9)
  • Post-operatively
    • +7.3 (-2 to +14)
  • Mean correction 24.1 degrees
  • 2 with lateral prominence (mild < 5mm)
  • 1 intra-operative fracture
  • 1 ulna nerve palsy

Discussion

  • Many approaches/osteotomies/fixation described
  • Perceived advantages of reverse V
    • High. Providing better fixation. Particularly in adult.
    • Inherently stable
    • Easy and precise assessment/correction of lateral prominence through pre-op plan
  • Fixation
    • Lateral crossed K-wires with supplemental wiring
    • Reduced chance of iatrogenic nerve injury
    • Stable enabling active ROM to begin at 2 weeks

Pros of Study

  • Well described Case series/technical note

 

Take home message

Reverse V osteotomy is a potential technique for correction of cubitus varus deformity in children

 

Webpage Last Modified: 30 June, 2010
Return to top